PlaceEconomics Blog

This blog is the lessons learned from cities, clients, and students about what makes good cities, about historic preservation, about downtown revitalization and about economic development based on my work and travels throughout the US and elsewhere.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Nature Conservancy, Anonymous Posts and Demolition

One of the first posts I made to this blog (May 2, 2008) was about the Indianapolis chapter of the Nature Conservancy building their new state headquarters. A newspaper story at the time quoted the state director as saying. "We're an international conservation organization. If anyone should be walking the walk of sustainability it should be The Nature Conservancy." But the Nature Conservancy's version of "walking the walk" is tearing down an 19th Century warehouse building so that they could build a new, LEED certified green gizmo building.

Here is the building they claimed they couldn't rehabilitate.You know those awe inspiring before and after pictures of historic rehabilitation projects? Well the picture above is the "before", here's the Nature Conservancy's "after".




A couple of weeks ago I got two comments, obviously written by the same person, who said they were "a person that [sic] is very familiar with this project". The poster said there was a "consensus" to tear the building down. Since there were numerous preservationists in Indianapolis who tried to assist the Nature Conservancy in figuring out how to reuse the historic building, I guess the "consensus" was among those already committed to demolition.

In response to my comment that another historic warehouse building in Indianapolis of about the same size was being rehabilitated for less than half the cost of the Nature Conservancy structure AND was going to be LEED certified the poster said, "Did you ever bother to ask what the building that is spending $68/s.f. is actually trying to obtain from LEED? I guarantee it is not LEED Platinum." So here we go, a prepubescent 5th grade playground mentality, "Your LEED is only Gold. Mine is Platinum." The idiocy of stars on spelling tests.


You are certainly welcome to go back to the earlier entry and read the comments that were posted in their entirety. I have the integrity to allow such comments to be posted. The writer of this one, however, had neither the integrity nor the balls to use their own name and posted as "Anonymous." Quite a bit of courage that takes.

But don't despair, the historic warehouse remains. Here it is.


So, congratulations, Nature Conservancy. You not only are going to get a Platinum Plaque for your Porch from LEED. I'm also awarding you a Titanium Triangle for lacking the imagination of how to use a century old building which would have been the ultimate in recycling.

For those of you who contribute to environmental causes - pick someone else. The hypocritical and disingenuous Nature Conservancy doesn't understand what sustainable development really is.






Labels: ,

3 Comments:

  • At February 17, 2009 6:29 PM , Blogger Val said...

    Great post, sad story. We have similar things happening in Portland, OR, a city known for its sustainability efforts. Recently, Portland State University tore down a couple of buildings to make way for what they are calling a "Sustainability Center". Meanwhile there were plenty of other great historic and vacant buildings in the area that they didn't even consider as an option, including a US Custom House building that the GSA is trying to offload for a pittance.

     
  • At April 28, 2009 6:37 AM , Blogger Richard Layman said...

    The other example of what a conservation organization can do in terms of rehabilitating a historic building is what Ecotrust did in Portland...

    http://www.ecotrust.org/ncc/

    It should be a widely known example, and should be offered up in any situation where a "conservation" organization proposes to demolish a historic building.

     
  • At April 29, 2009 6:18 PM , Blogger rypkema said...

    Thanks, Richard, for that example. It should be more widely known and I should do a better job of pointing out examples of where environmental groups DO get the connection between saving the environment and reusing historic buildings.

    Thanks for providing this one.

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home